Aug 29 2008
NEWSMATTERS - A “Hail Sarah” Pass
A “HAIL SARAH” PASS
So John McCain picks Sarah Palin as his running mate. Risky, yes, but I think a brilliant strategic choice. As calculated a choice as could be, but what else is new. No longer can McCain or the RNC seriously use “the experience issue” against Obama, after his pickup of Palin. She has served approx. 1-1/2 years as the Governor of Alaska. Before that, she was the mayor a small Alaska town. Before that, the PTA. NO, none, zilch, nada, zip, Zero foreign policy experience.
I can only think that McCain thought, realized, that with the demographics and numbers being what they are, there was no way in the world he could come out on top over Obama running the same ol’ same ol’ campaign, with the lackluster running mates you’ve heard bandied about in the press over the last few months as the prospects. In picking Palin, only in picking someone like Palin one could argue, he has made a “game changing” decision. I’ll say it again, risky, yes–for the lack of experience, the untried nature of the candidate, the so-little-known-ness about her, her total lack of experience on the national stage. But clearly, he is hoping to win over some of the disaffected “Hillary” voters. And generally throw down the gauntlet by saying “hey, I can make history too!” by putting a woman beside him. Perhaps winning a nod from enough Independents and “Reagan Democrats” who would more easily vote for a woman than a Black guy. That’s the throw of the dice that McCain’s just played craps with in this choice.
So I return again to the “brilliant” choice of it, in my belief. How otherwise could he have energised his “side” of this race? I’ve seen enough of her to know she is a tough cookie. She speaks well, is bright, engaging, attractive (a former beauty queen) with a down-to-earth quality that will appeal to a lot of folks. Do not underestimate her. It would be easy to predict that Biden could “eviscerate” her in a debate over foreign affairs. I don’t know that she knows anything about foreign affairs. Even in her acceptance speech today, what little she said on the subject was basically that she supports McCain. But for all Biden’s prowess, knowledge and experience, in any debate between the two of them–the bar will be set awfully low for her. Basically, if she can stand vertical and not dissemble before our eyes, it will be considered a success. Biden, with his loose tongue, is more apt to put his foot in his mouth than she.
I can only hope, as is said all too often, that when all’s said and done, people vote for Prez, and not the VP slot. What we do know about Sarah P. is that she is a staunch conservative. She had worked on Pat Buchanan’s earlier campaign. She is pro-gun, “pro-life”, anti-gay rights. She has an 80% approval rate in Alaska. All of this makes her hugely popular with the Republican base, and she will greatly help to energise that crowd. But their base has shrunk, and the Dems numbers are larger this time around. I hope the Dems, this time, are smart enough and skillful enough to make the choices before us clear, pund home the issues, and enough Independents swing Barack’s way.
_______________________________________________________
Zach Newman is a writer and political junkie. His “day job”, though, is as an experienced, reliable and trusted Realtor in the Portland area. He is a longtime member of PABA - Portland’s GLBT Chamber of Commerce. Call Zach at 503.287.8989 or visit his website at: http://www.equitygroup.com/zach.
3 Responses to “NEWSMATTERS - A “Hail Sarah” Pass”
Leave a Reply




Huh?
I thought VP’s were supposed to chosen for strategic reasons like balance and electability.
Nevermind that THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR SHOULD BE THE VP’S ABILITY TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT IF CALLED UPON TO DO SO.
Balance usually involves things like geography. If McCain were smart, he would have chosen the most popular Republican in any of the battleground states (Michigan, Florida, Ohio.) His choice comes from Alaska and likely locks up three electoral votes he almost certainly would have won anyway.
Alaska and Arizona aren’t even separated on an alphabetical list of US States (unless you also include territories, in which case American Samoa screws up my point.)
I agree, Zach, it seems to be a desperate move by McCain. Perhaps all the other contenders for Republican VP were found to have Manhunt profiles?
Choosing a VP is perhaps one of the most important decisions a presidential candidate can make. Look what the Republicans have done to us: Dan Quayle, Dick Cheney. At least Bob Dole had a qualified leader in Jack Kemp.
I’d like to think that Barack Obama chose Joe Biden from a list of people who had already passed the first and most important test of potential VP’s. Would I want this person to be President?
I suspect that McCain has lost way more than he gained in this choice and that Obama gained way more with his.
I hope you’re right with your last sentence Rob. YOu give a reasoned argument, but the electorate cannot be relied upon to be reasonable–look at who they elected the last 2 terms. Of course the most important qualification for VP Should be their capacity to step into the presidency, but all too often VPs are selected in an effort to Win. After all, Dan Quayle’s ‘guy’ WON the election, as did Cheney’s. Of Course she’s not qualified to step into the presidency, but McCain’s pick is a totally transparent, calculated attempt to win. As it is, he Did succeed in stealing the thunder away from Barack the morning after such a spectacular evening–the blogosphere, radio and cable outlets have been buzzing about Sarah P all day! I tried to extrapolate why Palin Might be a smart choice from the “winning” angle. Hopefully, the transparency will become obvious and with any luck, she’ll fall on her face and people will See. Believe me, Rob, I HOPE you are right!!!
Watching Moyers now and Katrina Vanden Heuvel of The Nation says, of the choice in discussion, “brilliant, clever and cynical.”
To segue a bit, and perhaps more pertinent to my earlier posting re “Barack says ‘Enough’!”, I’ve been lamenting, decrying, for years: “Where is the outrage?!!!” Bill Moyers, reflecting on the current political milieu, says: “There is no Left field out there now.” (My hero :-).)